Competitive Bidding Is Back: Is Your DME Operation Ready Before Registration Opens?
Medicare’s Round 2028 DMEPOS competitive-bidding registration opens December 1. Here are the operational questions suppliers should answer before deciding whether to bid.
Curasev
Features
Get Curasev
Arrow to Learn More
Competitive Bidding Is Back: Is Your DME Operation Ready Before Registration Opens?
Curasev Team
Author
5
Minutes to Read
November 10, 2026
Last Updated

Medicare DMEPOS competitive bidding is returning, and the first deadline is closer than it looks.

Bidder registration for Round 2028 opens December 1, 2026, and the bid window opens January 5, 2027. This round uses a single nationwide Remote Item Delivery (RID) structure across seven product categories.

For suppliers evaluating whether to participate, the question is not only whether to submit a bid. It is whether the operation behind that bid is ready to support the work that follows.

Competitive bidding is often discussed as a pricing decision. In practice, it is also an operational commitment. A supplier that wins a contract needs the data, workflows, fulfillment processes, documentation, and accountability to deliver consistently across the contract period.

Before registration opens, these are the questions worth answering.

What changes in Round 2028?

CMS has announced that Round 2028 will use one nationwide Remote Item Delivery competitive bidding area, covering all states, territories, and the District of Columbia, across seven product categories:

  • Continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) and insulin pumps
  • Urological supplies
  • Ostomy supplies
  • Hydrophilic urinary catheters
  • Off-the-shelf (OTS) back braces
  • Off-the-shelf (OTS) knee braces
  • Off-the-shelf (OTS) upper-extremity braces

The registration window opens December 1, 2026, followed by the bid window on January 5, 2027.

For some suppliers, this may be the first time their product category has been included in a competitive bidding program. For others, the nationwide structure changes the scale of the decision. Either way, readiness matters more than simply meeting a deadline.

A bid is only as strong as the operation behind it

Submitting a complete bid is essential. But if a supplier is awarded a contract, the real work begins after the decision.

Can the team fulfill orders consistently? Can it maintain visibility across documentation, inventory, shipment, delivery, and billing? Can it handle exceptions without losing track of what is delayed, missing, or owned by someone else?

A competitive price does not solve an operational gap.

The suppliers best positioned to evaluate the opportunity are the ones that can see their current operation clearly: where work moves smoothly, where it relies on manual follow-up, and where information becomes hard to find as volume increases.

Can you trust the data behind the decision?

A bidding decision depends on reliable inputs.

Before registration, suppliers should be able to review product volume, fulfillment costs, order patterns, payer activity, and operational capacity without rebuilding the picture from disconnected reports.

The goal is not simply to gather more data. It is to make sure the data tells a consistent story.

If pricing, inventory, documentation, and order history live in separate places, the team may spend more time reconciling information than evaluating the opportunity. That creates risk before a bid is even submitted.

A useful readiness review asks:

  • Do we have reliable historical data for the applicable products?
  • Can we see the true operational cost of fulfilling an order?
  • Can we identify patterns in exceptions, returns, resupply, or service needs?
  • Are our reports based on shared, current information?

Can orders move through a consistent workflow?

Contract readiness is not only about how many orders a supplier can receive. It is about how reliably those orders can move.

A connected workflow should make it clear:

  • What stage each order is in
  • What information is still missing
  • Who owns the next action
  • What is holding the order back
  • Whether the order is ready for fulfillment and billing

When those answers depend on inboxes, personal spreadsheets, or individual memory, an increase in volume can turn routine work into a series of manual exceptions.

The strongest operations do not expect every order to follow a perfect path. They make exceptions visible early enough for the right person to resolve them.

Is fulfillment connected to the rest of the order?

Remote Item Delivery puts fulfillment at the center of both the beneficiary experience and the supplier’s operational responsibility.

That means fulfillment cannot operate as a separate step after intake and documentation. Inventory availability, item configuration, shipping status, delivery confirmation, and patient communication all need to connect back to the original order.

Before bidding, suppliers should know whether their process can answer basic questions quickly:

  • Is the correct item available?
  • Is the order complete and ready to release?
  • Has the item shipped or been delivered?
  • What documentation supports that delivery?
  • What happens when an order cannot move as planned?

A process that works when one person checks every detail may not hold up at nationwide scale.

Are exceptions visible and owned?

Every DME operation has exceptions: incomplete documentation, missing information, product substitutions, shipping delays, patient outreach, billing questions, and resupply changes.

The issue is not whether exceptions occur. It is whether they become work the team can see, assign, and resolve.

A strong exception process answers five questions:

  1. What is unresolved?
  2. Why does it matter for this order?
  3. Who owns the next action?
  4. When is follow-up due?
  5. What must happen before the order can advance?

When those answers exist only in a note or someone’s inbox, continuity depends on the person who last touched the order. When they are part of a shared workflow, the team can keep moving even as priorities and staffing change.

Readiness is an operational decision

Competitive bidding creates a decision point, not just a registration date.

For some suppliers, the right conclusion may be to prepare and participate. For others, it may be to pause, review capabilities, and decide that the timing or category is not the right fit.

Either way, the decision should rest on a clear view of the operation, not on assumptions about what can be managed later.

The suppliers best prepared for Round 2028 will not necessarily be the ones with the longest checklist. They will be the ones that can connect information, ownership, and execution from the moment an order enters the business through fulfillment and follow-up.

That is the operational foundation that makes growth more manageable, whether it comes from a competitive bidding contract or any other change in demand.

For a closer look at cost visibility and the economics behind a bid, read why operational readiness matters before Round 2028.

This article is for general operational education and is not legal, contracting, or bidding advice. Suppliers should review current guidance from CMS and the Competitive Bidding Implementation Contractor (CBIC) for the requirements that apply to their organization.

Sources: CMS Round 2028 announcement · CMS DMEPOS Competitive Bidding Program information · Round 2028 bid-preparation resources

Previous Article
Your Intake Team Is Drowning in Documents. Seva AI Changes That.
Curasev's Seva AI automates DME/HME document intake by capturing, classifying, and extracting data from faxes, emails, and cloud storage to create a "billing-ready" workflow.
Read More →

Ready to see how Curasev fits your business?

Stop forcing your team to work around outdated software. Our end-to-end platform is built to mirror your specific HME workflow—from the first referral intake to the final collection.

Get Curasev
Arrow to Learn More